Deliverables
for 2016
Finally, this old brontosaurus rex has manteshelved
laboriously into the 21st century. I admit that ‘deliverables’
is a useful word – used properly. My problem over a few years now has been that
when people use this word they too often seem to be worrying a saucepan on the
kitchen floor like hungry dogs: they think that anything at all involved in the
pursuit of a target is somehow part of the deliverables. So the process becomes
confused with the needed result – the outcome or target – being pursued.
If I have a business-like resolution for the New Year – that
shiny, polished and minty thing starting tomorrow – it is not to concentrate on
the ‘what’ question, so much as the ‘how’ question. The how is about process,
the ‘what’ is mostly to do with the deliverables. (In truth, this is the
last time I shall use that word in this piece, probably.)
When it comes to communications strategies, the process in
all things business is critically important. It concerns how we use our people
and our funds effectively; it is the mechanism for reform, improvement and
change, for redefinition, reinvention and stimulation of all the parts of a
reasonably well-oiled machine.
That makes it all sound easy to accomplish, and it can be
depending on how well the internal communications mechanism marries with the
brand and all other aspects of external communications. I’m not going to use terms
like social functionality, stakeholder engagement, reporting profiles and other
such isms of business-speke. They will only confuse unless they are hard-fixed
in a proper business diagram.
But let’s look briefly at the process.
By asking how we will achieve something, the question
presumes you have a particular goal or a set of goals. They may be tactical, as
concerns outwitting competitors; operational, as concerns the way you deploy
your resources; and strategic, describing how these two factors build towards
your vision for the future. If by chance you have not mapped out these three
factors by the last day of December 2015, it might be worth getting the pencil
or flip chart ready, pretty soon.
To meet the goals you need a process or set of carefully
interwoven processes depending on the size of your company. For example, regular
monthly checks against your business plan to measure actual versus desired
results, budget spend and other er…achievables…is a very worthy process in pure
business terms. How, whether and when you communicate your progress is also important
to build into the programme. This part – this process of communication – should
be part of the definitive plan. Do it well and everyone feels they are
contributing to clear goals; do it badly and no one knows what to do, when to
do it and whether what they have already done is worth anything to the
organisation.
Wouldn’t it be nice if everyone felt they had achieved
something useful at the end of each working day? Too often your main resource –
people – are out of the loop and spend copious amounts of unnecessary time
running round in circles. That is not just a factor of poor supervision or
management, it is because too many people are not party to the tactical,
operational and strategic decisions. However, if you happen to be spending fat
wads of cash on knowledge management you might be barking up the wrong tree;
there is a big difference between managing what you think people ought to know
and what they really need to know, which is whether they are doing well or
badly. An appropriate smile is worth a thousand emails from semi-detached
bosses in adjoining seats. One approach is sterile and back-covering; the other
is human and purposeful.
Enough for the moment. What I have avoided mentioning here is
what I do to help businesses communicate better. Find out more on my website.
Call me if you need help; tell me what you want and ask me how I might achieve
it.
No comments:
Post a Comment